What should be done during Phase 2 of the Prevention Policy implementation?

During Phase 2 of the Prevention Policy implementation, the primary focus is on fine-tuning the prevention measures by identifying and addressing false positives. This is crucial because, as organizations start to implement protective policies, they may encounter situations where legitimate activities are incorrectly flagged as threats. By thoroughly reviewing these incidents and allowing whitelisting of known safe applications or activities, administrators can enhance the effectiveness of the prevention policy without compromising user productivity or system performance.

This phase aims at refining the accuracy of the prevention measures while maintaining a robust security posture. It involves adjusting the policy settings to minimize disruptions caused by false positives, thus ensuring that the prevention mechanisms do not inadvertently block legitimate business processes.

The other options do not align with the objectives of this phase; focusing exclusively on aggressive measures or solely on detection would not address the key issue of false positives. Similarly, reverting to a detection-only policy would undermine the goal of moving towards effective prevention, which is the overarching aim of this phase in the implementation process.