Which of the following best describes the function of Linux sensors in RFM?

The function of Linux sensors in the context of RFM (Real-time File Monitoring) primarily involves monitoring and sending periodic status updates rather than directly identifying and responding to threats. In this capacity, the sensors act like support mechanisms, ensuring that the system is responsive by sending heartbeats, indicating that they are active and functioning.

These sensors are designed to provide foundational visibility and operational awareness, but they do not engage in direct detection processes like their counterparts in other operating systems that might have fuller capabilities. Therefore, the emphasis on sending heartbeats signifies an important role in maintaining system communication and integrity, while the lack of detection suggests a limit to their direct engagement with threat mitigation.

Understanding this function is crucial for administrators when configuring and managing Linux sensors within Falcon. Knowing their limitations allows for appropriate expectations and better strategic planning for security measures in their environments.